* Amal Clooney's firm reportedly has a lawyer working for £1.50 an hour, which in U.S. dollars is "piddly squat." [Legal Cheek]
* People are pretty worked up over raisins. [The Volokh Conspiracy / Washington Post]
* "A video shot in court shows a lawyer tussling with bailiffs and being forcibly removed in handcuffs from a foreclosure hearing." Go on... [Daily Business Review]
* Maybe that outsourcing thing was a bad idea for Biglaw. [Big Law Business / Bloomberg BNA]
* Keith Lee reviews Lat's Supreme Ambitions (affiliate link). [Associate's Mind]
* Yahoo! General counsel Ron Bell discusses the challenges and rewards of representing the tech giant. [Hsu Untied]
* Speaking of Yahoo!, on the eve of Obergefell, here's a quick guide to the American government's war on gays. [Yahoo!]
* Elizabeth Wydra, chief counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center, discusses the Affordable Care Act with Bob Garfield. Listen now while the ACA is still a thing. [On The Media]
* The NFLPA is appealing the 4-game suspension Tom Brady received in the wake of the Wells Report. It's more probable than not that he'll lose. [CNN]
* Lawyer tackles his own client trying to flee the courtroom. Great, now litigators have to start worrying about the long-term effect of concussions. [Legal Cheek]
* New rankings are out and Thomas M. Cooley Law School (or WMU or whatever) is NUMBER 1! Seriously. For real. Find out why... [Georgetown Law via TaxProf Blog]
* The Wright Brothers: The Original Patent Trolls. [Concurring Opinions]
* Are you into spy thrillers? What about lengthy treatises on standing? Well, then you're in luck. [Dorf on Law]
* A Washington prosecutorial office rocked by misconduct allegations. Ho hum, prosecutors break the rules. But the source -- a whistleblowing veteran prosecutor -- is a new twist. [The Open File]
* The jury is deliberating on Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's fate in the Boston bombing trial [Law and More]
* The final two items both focus on agricultural regulations. First, a look back at the life of Roscoe Filburn, the wheat farmer at the center of Wickard v. Filburn. Now I'll never not see Homer Simpson when I think of that case. [Lawyers, Guns & Money]
* Second, if you aren't following the raisins takings case, basically the government takes a share of the annual raisin crop for its own use... without compensating the growers. Put aside the constitutionality, that's startlingly inefficient when the government encourages farmers to shift away from a crop the government needs. Here's a video about the farmers at the center of the case. [YouTube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFbzLPJtYPE
